A Total Disregard of Free Speech by the Hsus by fowlnews on Blogster

The Humane Society Of The United States Disregards Free Speech And Threatens To Sue?

........"That's their claim, and we don't agree with their claim, so
we're going to continue to make these titles available," Amazon.com spokeswoman
Patty Smith said Tuesday afternoon. "It's up to the customer to determine what
they feel is appropriate for them to purchase." ......

And The Grit & Steel Ranks
#771 in Magazines This Afternoon

.......As of early afternoon, The Gamecock ranked 147th
out of more than 17,000 magazine titles on Amazon.com, while The Feathered
Warrior ranked 2,090th........

Humane Society Urges Amazon To Quit Selling Cockfighting Mags

July 18, 2006

By Associated Press

SEATTLE - The Humane Society of the United States has threatened to sue Amazon.com Inc. unless it stops selling two magazines that promote cockfighting.

Snip

Read Entire Article At: http://www.komotv.com/stories/44481.htm

6 comments on A Total Disregard of Free Speech by the Hsus

Catidogi said 2 years ago
From what I have seen, fighting with razor blades damages the birds terribly. 'Gestapo Slave Girls' outsells 'How Green Was My Valley.' Is that any reason to ban HGWMV?
fowlnews said 2 years ago
Agreed, no ban on HGWMV despite GSG kicking it in the the green valley. If the preferred vehicle for arsonists and other criminals to announce their Animal Rights crimes was financially supported by the Sue-E, surely that in itself would be a reason not to attempt to ban HGWMV. [SMILE] But wait, where is the moral redemption in financing criminal activity announcements but then attempting to ban another's free speech. [HUH]
Catidogi said 2 years ago
Since I live in Asia, I have only a reading knowledge of animal rights in the USA and Europe. It seems that supporters there are given to excess. In Afro-Asia, human rights do not exist the animals being treated better. At least, the authorities can dine on the animals.
A US dog has more rights than a North Korean for example. I envy your dogs etc and I wish them well.[SMILE]
nobullthinker said 2 years ago
Generaly speaking animal rights activists are a bit looney. On the other hand you might try imagining yourself locked in a cage with a hundred or so armed and agitated roosters. While I find that your fetish has no redeeming moral value I agree that your blood porn has a right to exist as free speech.
KDawg said 2 years ago
[LOL] and I view non compassionate people as you seem to be as cruel... how interesting! [TONGUE]
fowlnews said 2 years ago
Generally speaking animal rights activists are a bit loony, granted, and these animal rights activists are a mainstream non-profit claimed animal protection. While I find the fetish of Animal Rights has no redeeming moral value, I also find the HSUS further wavering from moral value since it quietly funded an Internet service used by the violent criminals of the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) from 1998 till 2002 when the funding was discovered and publicized. Waste.org, hosted the ALF “Frontline” mailing list, the preferred vehicle for arsonists and other criminals to announce their Animal Rights crimes. Imagining yourself locked in a cage with a hundred or so armed and agitated waiste.orges, their fetish blood porn having a right to exist as free speech, but then there is the redeeming moral value issue.[HUH]